Monday, April 8, 2019

Manual Testing Versus Automation Testing

Manual testing has long appeared before automation testing did. Therefore, this is believed to be a reliable process when it comes to software testing. However, many have contradicted this and according to several studies, this is prone to errors due to the fact that this offers a big chance for a tester to commit mistakes.

This is why automation software testing has been created.

Many believe that automation is the key to having a successful software testing process. Still, experts recommend that one should not jump into the conclusion that he should automate the testing procedure. This is why there are guidelines that a tester should check on before he turns to automated testing.

Since manual and automation testing have both pros and cons, you probably wonder which among these two should be considered as a better process. The real answer here is that both of them are ideal for software testing. However, there is a need for a developer to determine the right time regarding when he should go for manual or automation. So, let us proceed with the pros of automation testing. They say that there are a lot of benefits that can be gained here.


One of them is the reality that if a test engineer will have to run a series of test multiple times, this is the brightest solution. Another is that this gives a good advantage for those who want it run automation on a code that often changes so that the tester will be able to catch the regressions promptly. The benefits do not stop here since the automation testing can give a person the ability to execute the automation process in mainstream scenarios and also helps in testing a huge test matrix.

This pertains to different languages that are on various operating system platforms. Meanwhile, the cons of automation include the cost since writing test cases usually cost more when compared to manual testing. In addition to this, you are not allowed to mechanize visual references. For instance, if you are not able to tell the color of the font through the code or the tool that you are using, you will have to resort to manual testing.

Speaking of testing manually, the pros here include the occurrence of the test case that will only have to run at most two times and therefore, you will not have to automate it so that you can save more on the costs. Aside from this, the tester is permitted to perform random or ad hoc tests. Based on reports, this type of tests can find more bugs than with automation. The more time that the tester spends on testing the software, the greater the odds of locating the user bugs.

Manual tests are of course time-consuming and if there is a new build, it is required that a tester rerun the necessary tests. Now, if you are having trouble deciding on whether you should automate or not, you can look at the tools that you are using. Also, check if you will get back on the investment when you automate the software testing process for that pa1`rticular program.


If you are interested in Automation testing, check this website to learn more about automation software testing.

No comments:

Post a Comment